Belief in the 'middle way'
Re: "Thailand's Dhammacracy", (PostBag, Sept 1).
That is the most thought-provoking of one's views on Buddhism's role in Thailand's politics. Though not a scholar of Buddhism or a devout Buddhist, one hardly reads or hears of politicians using Buddhism as a means of attack or defence. It is almost sacrilege to refer to Buddhism in that arena.
It may be that Buddhist tenets that have influenced politics. One likes to think that the words mai pen rai (never mind) are influenced by Buddhism as things will be corrected.
One doubts Buddhism is a means of suppressing the thought of democracy. On the contrary, Thailand may have avoided any civil wars because of calmly accepting that a democratic time would come. Our democracy may not be full-fledged, but we slowly achieve a better degree of democracy as time goes by.
In our democratic movement since 1932 -- almost one century -- there has been only one conflict bordering a civil war, in 1973. It eventually calmed down and returned to normalcy. One likes to credit that to Buddhism's belief in the middle way.
Permanent interests
Re: "The implications of Paetongtarn's leadership", (Opinion, Aug 27).
To an outsider, it may seem that any political party challenging the Thai establishment is doomed to either dissolution by the judiciary or overthrow by a military coup.
The Move Forward Party, led by a fiery leader whose policies threatened the status quo, faced dissolution and the banishment of its leaders -- a predictable outcome given the historical pattern.
Mr Kavi might want to consider how many coup leaders accused of corruption have ever faced suspension by courts. A recent coup leader appointed himself prime minister. He lacked experience in public speaking, leadership, or public policy-crafting, while others flaunted their wealth with pricey items such as a Richard Mille watch and diamond ring.
In contrast, Mr Srettha and Ms Paetongtarn have demonstrated their ability to articulate ideas and exchange in meaningful discourse.
The situation in Myanmar has been ongoing for decades, and no Thai prime minister has made a significant impact on resolving it. Instead, Thai coup leaders have often supported the Myanmar military in strengthening its hold on power.
The Pheu Thai Party deserves recognition for securing second place in the election, thanks to the support of the electorate. As the saying goes, "In politics, there are no permanent enemies, no permanent friends, only permanent interests."
I agree with Mr Kavi that military coups and dynastic politics in Asean share similarities. As long as courts or military coups overthrow elected governments, Thailand's future will remain uncertain.